‘Hell to pay’: Trump issues ‘last warning’ to Hamas. Here is what may be next for Israel and Gaza ‘There’s going to be some action taken,’ Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff told reporters the day after Trump issued what he said was his final ultimatum to

Former President Donald Trump issued a strong, final warning to Hamas, the Palestinian group responsible for the brutal attacks on Israel in October 2023. This warning came on the heels of a deeply emotional meeting with eight Israeli hostages who had been recently released from Gaza, where they had been held captive by Hamas. Trump’s message to Hamas, delivered through his social media platform, Truth Social, was uncompromising and filled with the threat of severe consequences.

In his post, Trump declared, “Shalom Hamas,” using the Hebrew greeting as part of his final ultimatum to the group. His statement was direct and forceful, warning that Hamas would face “HELL TO PAY” if they did not release all remaining Israeli hostages. The phrase, written in all caps, emphasized the severity of his message. Trump also condemned Hamas as “sick and twisted,” describing their actions as unacceptable and demanding that they release every Israeli still held in captivity.

This message was considered Trump’s most direct threat to Hamas in several months and came after he met with the former hostages at the White House. The meeting was described by Steve Witkoff, Trump’s Middle East envoy, as a deeply emotional experience for the president. The former hostages, who had endured terrible conditions under Hamas captivity, expressed their gratitude to Trump, with some even saying that they believed he had been “sent by God” to save them. They thanked him for his efforts to secure their release and urged him to continue working to bring home those still held in Gaza.

In response, Trump told the freed hostages that the situation had changed, referencing the “something” that had led to their release. He assured them that the work was far from over and emphasized that his focus would now be on securing the release of the remaining hostages still trapped by Hamas. His words made it clear that the former president was fully committed to ensuring that no one remained in captivity, especially under the dire conditions described by the hostages.

The former hostages shared disturbing details of their time in captivity, recounting deprivation, brutal treatment, and even witnessing murders. These accounts deeply affected Trump, and he expressed his anger at the conditions the hostages had endured. Witkoff confirmed that the president was shocked and outraged by the stories they told, which reinforced his determination to act decisively against Hamas. “The President listened to it, absorbed it, and said this is unacceptable,” Witkoff said, quoting Trump’s response. “I’m not going to tolerate this type of behavior.”

This meeting, along with Trump’s public statements, has raised questions about what will happen next. Witkoff made it clear that some form of action would be taken in the near future, but the exact nature of that action remains uncertain. He suggested that any action could involve cooperation with Israel, though he stressed that the specifics were still unclear. What is certain, however, is that Trump has made it clear that he expects Hamas to change its behavior. He gave them an opportunity to act “reasonably” by releasing all hostages and leaving Gaza, but warned that failure to do so would lead to significant consequences.

While Trump’s statements have created tension, they are not the only diplomatic efforts underway to address the crisis. Other Arab countries and international actors have been involved in negotiations aimed at stopping the war between Israel and Hamas. These diplomatic efforts are centered around ending the violence and preventing further bloodshed, but the path forward is complicated. The conflict between Israel and Hamas has been ongoing for years, and while some negotiations have been attempted, finding a lasting solution remains elusive.

In the midst of this complex and volatile situation, Trump’s strong words have added another layer of tension. His “last warning” to Hamas, coupled with his promise of “hell to pay,” signals that he believes the time for diplomacy is running out and that more direct action is needed. Trump’s approach, while forceful, has garnered support from those who believe that Hamas must be held accountable for their actions. However, critics argue that escalating the conflict could lead to even more bloodshed and make it harder to achieve peace in the region.

Hamas, for its part, has not shown any signs of backing down. The group has long been entrenched in Gaza, with deep-rooted political and ideological motivations behind its actions. Despite international pressure, including the threat of further military action, Hamas continues to refuse to release hostages and cease its attacks on Israel. This resistance has created a dangerous stalemate, where both sides are at a standstill, and the potential for further violence remains high.

The international community is also watching the situation closely, with various countries and organizations weighing in on the crisis. Some nations have expressed support for Israel’s right to defend itself against Hamas, while others have called for a ceasefire and an end to the violence. The differing perspectives highlight the complexities of the conflict, as well as the challenges facing those who seek a peaceful resolution.

What happens next will depend on several factors, including the actions of Hamas, the response from Israel, and the level of international involvement in the negotiations. While Trump’s warning has certainly raised the stakes, it remains to be seen whether it will prompt Hamas to change its approach or whether it will lead to further escalation.

For now, the situation remains tense, and the future of Israel and Gaza hangs in the balance. As the world waits to see how this crisis unfolds, the hope is that diplomatic efforts will eventually lead to peace, but the reality is that the path to that peace may be fraught with difficult choices and painful compromises. Whether through military action, diplomacy, or a combination of both, the next steps will be critical in determining the outcome of this ongoing conflict.